CRE-320 · Lesson 8 of 12 · 27 min
Children, teens and vulnerable audiences
The overall impression test asks how a message is understood by the people it reaches. When those people are children, teenagers or adults in vulnerable situations, the standard rises. Children may not recognize advertising at all, teenagers are especially sensitive to social pressure and body image, and adults facing illness, debt or loneliness can be more easily persuaded by promises that speak to their fears. This lesson covers the special rules on advertising to children in each country, children's privacy, the growing body of law on child influencers themselves, and how creators can recognize and protect vulnerable audiences more generally.
Why children are treated differently
Research on child development shows that younger children often cannot distinguish advertising from other content and do not understand its persuasive intent. Even older children who recognize ads may not resist them in the way adults do. Influencer content makes this harder still: a favorite creator's enthusiasm for a toy or snack feels like a friend's recommendation, not an advertisement, and children may form strong parasocial bonds with creators they watch daily. For these reasons, both countries restrict advertising to children and expect disclosures aimed at children to be extra clear.
COPPA and children's privacy
The United States does not ban advertising to children, but it regulates collection of children's data through the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the FTC's COPPA Rule.
COPPA applies to operators of websites and online services directed to children under 13, and to general-audience operators with actual knowledge that they collect personal information from children under 13. It requires clear privacy notices and verifiable parental consent before collecting, using or disclosing children's personal information.
The FTC finalized major amendments to the COPPA Rule, published on April 22, 2025, effective June 23, 2025, with most compliance obligations applying from April 22, 2026.
The amendments require separate verifiable parental consent before disclosing children's personal information to third parties for purposes such as targeted advertising, require a written data retention policy and a written information security program, and expand the definition of personal information to include biometric identifiers.
For creators, COPPA matters most on platforms such as YouTube. In 2019 Google and YouTube paid $170 million to settle FTC and New York charges that YouTube collected children's data without parental consent; since then, creators must label videos as "made for kids" when they are directed at children, which disables personalized ads and some features.
Creators can themselves be treated as operators of child-directed content, and the FTC has said it may act against channel owners.
Worked problem
Is a channel directed to children?
A creator's channel features slime-making tutorials with bright animation, toy giveaways and nursery-rhyme music. Analytics estimate 45 % of viewers are under 13. A slime brand wants a sponsored video that asks viewers to comment their name and city to enter a giveaway. What COPPA issues arise?
Show solution
- The FTC considers subject matter, visual content, music, characters, child celebrities, audience composition and ads on the service when deciding if content is directed to children.
- Slime, animation, toy giveaways and nursery-rhyme music, with a large under-13 audience, suggest the channel is directed to children.
- Asking children to post their name and city collects personal information.
- Collecting it without verifiable parental consent would breach COPPA, and the videos should be labeled "made for kids."
Answer: The channel is likely child-directed; the giveaway should not collect children's personal information without verifiable parental consent, and the creator should label the content correctly and consider a different entry method aimed at parents.
Self-regulation and FTC guidance on children
The Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of BBB National Programs applies its Advertising Guidelines to advertising directed at children under 13 in all media. Updated guidelines, effective in 2022, include specific provisions for influencer and online advertising: disclosures must be clear to children, ideally spoken and shown in language children understand, such as "ad" or "paid for by"; advertising must be easily identifiable as advertising; and it must not exploit children's inexperience, use undue pressure to buy or blur the line between content and ads.
The FTC's 2023 Endorsement Guides note that endorsements in advertising directed at children may be of special concern because of children's character, and the FTC has said it expects disclosures for child audiences to be understandable to them.
| Element | Adult audience | Child audience |
|---|---|---|
| Wording | #ad, Sponsored | Simple spoken words such as This video is an ad and [Brand] paid me |
| Placement | Start of caption and video | Start of video, spoken and on screen, repeated |
| Frequency | At start and periodically | More often, near each product appearance |
| Visual cues | Platform label | Large on-screen text or icon children recognize |
| Style | Neutral | Age-appropriate, without pressure to buy |
Child influencers and family channels
A newer area of law protects the children who appear in content. Family vlogs and child influencer channels can earn significant income, and the children involved may have no say in how their images are used and no share in the money they help earn.
Several states have passed laws to protect child influencers. Illinois became the first in 2023, with a law effective July 1, 2024, requiring that a share of earnings from content featuring minors under 16 be set aside in a trust. California followed with laws effective in 2025 extending similar protections. Minnesota passed a law effective July 1, 2025, that prohibits children under 14 from engaging in certain monetized content creation and gives young people rights to have content removed. Other states have considered similar bills, so creators who feature children should check the rules where they live.
Teenagers
Teenagers are not covered by the strict children's rules in most places, but they are a sensitive audience. Concerns include body image and appearance pressure, which are heightened by filters and edited images; risky behavior and dangerous challenges; and products restricted to adults, such as alcohol, vaping and gambling. Many platforms apply teen-specific protections, such as limiting ad targeting and restricting branded content for certain categories to adult audiences. Creators with teen audiences should avoid promoting adult products, cosmetic procedures and extreme diets, and should be especially careful about edited images.
Vulnerable adults
Vulnerability is not only about age. Adults can be vulnerable because of illness, disability, grief, financial stress, addiction, low literacy, language barriers or loneliness. Advertising law in both countries considers the targeted audience, and regulators have taken particular interest in marketing that exploits vulnerability: miracle cures aimed at people with serious diseases, get-rich-quick schemes aimed at people in debt, and products that play on body image insecurity.
- Health anxiety: avoid promising relief to people facing serious or chronic illness; refer them to qualified professionals.
- Financial stress: avoid promoting high-cost credit, risky investments or "side hustle" schemes with unrealistic income claims.
- Body image: avoid promoting extreme diets, unproven weight loss products or cosmetic procedures to audiences struggling with appearance.
- Addiction: avoid gambling, alcohol and similar promotions to audiences that include people in recovery or communities you know are affected.
Worked problem
An ethical check for a vulnerable audience
A creator whose audience is mainly young adults who discuss debt and money struggles is offered $3,000 to promote a "trading academy" that advertises students "earning $500 a day." The brand will not share evidence of typical student results. Apply the ethics check from lesson 1.
Show solution
- Honesty: an earnings claim without evidence of typical results is likely misleading; the audience would feel misled if they knew.
- Fairness: the audience's financial stress makes them more likely to take risks on promised income; the deal exploits that vulnerability.
- Respect: without evidence, the audience cannot make an informed decision.
- Accountability: the creator would struggle to defend the post publicly or to a regulator.
Answer: The deal fails all four questions and should be declined; if the creator wanted to work with the brand at all, it would need substantiated typical-earnings data and could not use the $500-a-day claim.
Practical steps for creators
- Know your audience: check age data and comments for signs of young viewers, and treat estimates cautiously.
- Avoid sponsored content for adult products if a meaningful share of your audience is underage.
- Make disclosures child-friendly where children watch: spoken, simple, repeated and visible.
- Never collect children's personal information through giveaways or comments without proper consent.
- Protect children who appear in your content: limit identifying details and respect their wishes.
- Refuse deals that exploit vulnerability, even if they are legal.
Designing child-safe sponsored content
Where a creator's audience includes children, safe design matters as much as disclosure. Practical techniques include:
- Keep sponsored segments clearly separate from the rest of the content, with a spoken and visual signal at the start and end, such as "Now for an ad from [Brand]" and "The ad is over."
- Avoid direct calls to action aimed at children, such as "ask your parents to buy this" or "get it now before it's gone," which exploit children's limited ability to resist pressure.
- Avoid creating a sense that a child will be less liked, less cool or left out without the product.
- Do not use countdown timers, limited-time scarcity or repeated prompts to pressure purchases.
- Turn off or restrict comments where children might share personal information.
- Keep giveaways aimed at parents rather than children, and never collect children's details directly.
These techniques reflect the principles in self-regulatory codes in both countries: advertising to children must be clearly identifiable as advertising, must not exploit their inexperience and must not urge them to pressure parents.
Teens and platform protections
Platforms have added protections for teenage users that affect creators. Teen accounts often have more restrictive default settings, limits on direct messages from adults and restrictions on which ads and branded content they see, particularly for products such as alcohol, gambling, weight loss and cosmetic procedures. Some platforms also prevent advertisers from targeting teens based on interests. When a creator turns on age restrictions for branded content, teen accounts are excluded from seeing it. Using these tools for age-sensitive products is both good practice and, increasingly, a contractual requirement from brands.
Older adults and accessibility
Older adults are not inherently vulnerable, but scams and high-pressure sales disproportionately target them, and some products, such as hearing aids, mobility devices, supplements marketed for memory and investment products for retirement savings, are often promoted with exaggerated claims. Creators whose audiences include older viewers should be especially careful with health and financial claims and with urgency tactics. Accessibility matters for all audiences: captions, readable text and spoken disclosures help viewers with hearing or vision differences notice and understand that content is sponsored, which is exactly what clear and conspicuous disclosure requires.
When you are unsure about your audience
Platform analytics estimate age from account data, and many young users misstate their age when signing up, so estimates often undercount children and teens. Look for other signals as well: the topics viewers comment on, the language and spelling in comments, mentions of school or parents, and the times when engagement peaks. If those signals suggest a younger audience than the analytics show, treat the audience as younger for compliance purposes. When in doubt, choose the more protective approach: decline adult-product deals, make disclosures child-friendly and avoid collecting personal information.
Common mistakes
MistakeAssuming an audience is adult because the creator is.
InsteadCheck analytics; many creators have large young audiences.
MistakeRunning a giveaway that asks children for names and cities.
InsteadDo not collect children's data without proper consent.
MistakeUsing adult disclosure wording for child viewers.
InsteadUse simple, spoken, repeated disclosures children understand.
MistakeFeaturing children in monetized content without protecting them.
InsteadLimit identifying details and set aside earnings.
MistakePromoting income schemes to financially stressed audiences.
InsteadDecline deals that exploit vulnerability.
Summary and key terms
- Children may not recognize advertising, so the rules are stricter.
- Disclosures for children must be simple, spoken, visible and repeated.
- Children's privacy rules restrict collecting their personal information.
- Self-regulatory codes prohibit exploiting children's credulity and inexperience.
- Laws protecting child influencers are growing in some places.
- Teens need protection from adult products and body image pressure.
- Vulnerable adults deserve care; legal deals can still be unethical.
- COPPA
- The federal law protecting the online privacy of children under 13.
- Verifiable parental consent
- Consent from a parent confirmed by an approved method.
- Directed to children
- Content or services aimed at children under 13.
- Made for kids
- YouTube's label for child-directed content.
- CARU
- The Children's Advertising Review Unit.
- Data retention policy
- A written policy limiting how long data is kept.
- Parasocial relationship
- A one-sided bond a viewer forms with a creator.
- Child influencer
- A minor who features in monetized content.
- Vulnerable audience
- People more susceptible to persuasion or harm.
- Age-appropriate disclosure
- A disclosure that children can notice and understand.
Practice problems
Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.
What age does COPPA protect?
Show answer
Children under 13.
When did most amended COPPA obligations apply?
Show answer
From April 22, 2026.
What new consent did the 2025 amendments require?
Show answer
Separate parental consent for third-party disclosure such as targeted ads.
How much did Google and YouTube pay in 2019?
Show answer
$170 million.
What does the made for kids label do?
Show answer
Identifies child-directed content and disables personalized ads.
Which state first required trust accounts for child influencers?
Show answer
Illinois.
What does Minnesota's 2025 law prohibit?
Show answer
Certain monetized content creation by children under 14.
How should disclosures for children look under CARU?
Show answer
Clear, spoken and shown in words children understand.
Name two vulnerable adult groups.
Show answer
People with serious illness, debt, addiction or grief.
What should a creator do with a deal that exploits vulnerability?
Show answer
Decline it.
Lesson quiz · 5 questions
Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.
Create a free account to save your progress, take quizzes and earn a certificate.